You got to love it when people who don't believe in the Bible quote the Bible! 

Christians are to obey the Laws of the land unless it violates a command given by God.  A rule preventing the spread of the Gospel is a command that goes against what God teaches.

Act 5:27  When they had brought them, they stood them before the Council. The high priest questioned them,
Act 5:28  saying, "We gave you strict orders not to continue teaching in this name, and yet, you have filled Jerusalem with your teaching and intend to bring this man's blood upon us."
Act 5:29  But Peter and the apostles answered, "We must obey God rather than men.

Do Protostents have some extra commandments on the side or something?

Once again religion is starting a WAR. The only thing religion does is start WARS and kill people. And for what? People dieing just because they have different beliefs.If you ask me religion is evil.

Good luck.  Or perhaps just leave well enough alone!

 http://www.aclu.org/religion/schools/34998prs20080422.html

"We couldn't find a single case from any court in this country holding that Bible distribution to grade school students is constitutionally permissible," Esman continued. Judge Carl Barbier agreed that the school's actions violated the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and amounted to religious coercion."

http://blog.au.org/2007/07/30/islam-and-public-schools-accommodate-but-dont-promote-religion-says-muslim-activist/

"I can understand how difficult it is for public school officials to serve children from many different religious backgrounds (and none). They should remember, though, that the reason it is so difficult is because America is home to some 2,000 religious groups. It would be impossible for schools to teach reading, writing and arithmetic while catering to even a fraction of this number. Schools, therefore, should leave decisions about children’s religious upbringing to their families and houses of worship."

We are all missing what is going on in your head!  We are talking about flyers on a bulletin board.  Focus man.  Focus. 

Wrong!  It is referring to the authority rendered to government in general, not just one facet of it.  A good christian isn't a law breaker.  Period!

A good christian certainly could be a law breaker if a law of government goes against Gods law.  Gods law trumps all others.  But that's besides the point anyway, the church is only asking for protection under the law not special privelages.  The right to seek satisfaction through the judicial process is a main tenant of the American system.  You are saying that Christians don't have the same rights under the law that any other non-christian American would.

And for you to call the pastor of this church a law breaker is libelous.

Perhaps if you won't consider the bible study, a class on constitutional freedom would lend to your understanding of this debate.

It's actually very well known that more liberals living in Vermont have molested children than all catholic priests put together.

The slaughter of ~100Million last decade in the USSR, or the ~30k in Spain. All done by athiests, shocker.

Wrong!  It is referring to the authority rendered to government in general, not just one facet of it.  A good christian isn't a law breaker.  Period!

A good christian certainly could be a law breaker if a law of government goes against Gods law.  Gods law trumps all others.  But that's besides the point anyway, the church is only asking for protection under the law not special privelages.  The right to seek satisfaction through the judicial process is a main tenant of the American system.  You are saying that Christians don't have the same rights under the law that any other non-christian American would.

And for you to call the pastor of this church a law breaker is libelous.

Perhaps if you won't consider the bible study, a class on constitutional freedom would lend to your understanding of this debate.

Also, I never called anyone a law breaker.  My statement was; "A good Christian isn't a law breaker".   It is the absolute truth and names no one in particular, so tell me how that is libelous.    

hastings, very true.

The law that is being challenged in this case actually protects our children from religions that most of us would prefer our children not be exposed to until they are old enough to make decisions for themselves.  A win in this case will serve only to open the door to a multitude of organizations, some whose beliefs are so unmentionable that I'd be banned for describing them on this forum.  

My bible is pretty clear about whose obligation it is to raise children in a manner pleasing to God.  No where does it say the state has that obligation.  Teaching children about God is the responsibility of parents and the church.